Mr. McCarty was licensed in 1998. In 2019 and 2020, Ms. Allen failed to diligently pursue two related immigration matters and repeatedly misled her clients about the status of those matters. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Supreme Court of Arizona suspended him for six months and one day, and required that, following a reinstatement hearing, he would be subject to probation and additional terms. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. In another matter, following a dispute with his former partners that went to arbitration, Mr. McNabola issued a subpoena for an employee's cell phone records under the caption of the closed arbitration matter. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for nine months and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Virginia, effective on October 13, 2023, when his current Illinois reciprocal suspension is due to end. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for 90 days, with the suspension stayed after 30 days by a two-year period of probation, nunc pro tunc to November 23, 2020, subject to the conditions imposed in Indiana, and continuing until her probation in Indiana is terminated. The suspension is effective on October 12, 2022. No lawyer may petition for reinstatement until [six months before] the period of suspension has expired. Mr. Ward was licensed in Illinois in 1986 and in Wisconsin in 1985. If an objection is filed, the suspension shall not become effective until the evaluation of the objection is completed. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for one year and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in New Jersey. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. His misconduct arose from his June 2021 conviction in Lake County for aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol, causing the death of another. Mr. Salgado, who was licensed in 1993, was suspended for one year with all but the first 30 days stayed by a one-year period of conditional probation. Mr. Cohn, who was licensed in 1983, was suspended for six months and until he completes the ARDC Professionalism Seminar. The suspension is effective on October 12, 2022. In September 2021, a Michigan jury found him guilty of three counts of criminal sexual conduct. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. Posted April 1, 2022 12:54 PM. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. Mr. Wittig was licensed in Illinois in 1992 and in Arizona in 1997. The suspension is effective on December 14, 2022. In the course of representing a client, he failed to promptly turn over $43,601 in funds belonging to the client and third parties. He dishonestly converted $13,906.56 in funds belonging to two clients, failed to refund unearned fees, neglected and failed to effectively or timely communicate the status of matters to three clients, and failed to reduce two contingent fee agreements to writing. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. This page contains ARDC summaries of recent disciplinary decisions issued by the Supreme Court of Illinois. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. Mr. Stone, who was licensed in 1996, was disbarred on consent for neglecting six client matters, failing to refund approximately $16,000 in unearned fees, and making misrepresentations to clients, a court and the ARDC regarding those matters and his health. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Ms. Susman, who was licensed in 1983, was suspended for five months, with the suspension stayed in full by one year of probation with conditions. He failed to diligently pursue a workers' compensation and a personal injury matter and misrepresented the status of those matters to his clients. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for one year and until further order of the Court. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. Ms. Doss, who was licensed in 1989, was disbarred on consent for dishonestly converting $8,767 in funds being held in trust for her client in a real estate transaction and for improperly withholding $3,875 in funds being held in trust for that same client. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. Mr. Steckel, who was licensed in 2000, was disbarred on consent. He committed the criminal act of aggravated battery on one of his neighbors, a woman over 60 years of age. Mr. Farwell, who was licensed in 1992, was suspended for ninety days. Mr. Moore, who was licensed in 1986, was suspended for one year and until further order of Court. Mr. Banks, who was licensed in 1965, was suspended for two years and until further order of the Court and was required to demonstrate that he has paid $7,000 in restitution, plus interest, to his former client's sister prior to petitioning for reinstatement. In 2018, Mr. Szymanski again was arrested for an incident in which he punched his spouse in the arm and attempted to punch her in the stomach, for which he was charged with two counts of resisting a peace officer and two counts of domestic battery. Mr. Hynes, who was licensed in 2016, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after 90 days in favor of a three-year period of probation. Mr. Hankes, who was licensed in 2006, was suspended for three years and until he completes the ARDC Professionalism Seminar, for converting nearly $80,000 of client funds. In a separate disciplinary matter, a referee appointed by the Wisconsin Supreme Court issued a public reprimand against him for failing to promptly refund unearned fees to clients in two separate matters and mishandling client funds. She also failed to cooperate with the ARDC's investigation of her conduct. The suspension is effective on October 12, 2022. Ms. Koroll, who was licensed in 2001, was suspended for six months, with the suspension stayed after 60 days in favor of a one-year period of conditional probation. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for six months and until she is reinstated to the practice of law in Arizona, followed by a term of probation subject to the conditions imposed in Arizona and continuing until her Arizona probation is completed. She took a $2,500 retainer to represent a client in a civil matter but did not pursue the matter, communicate with the client, or refund her unearned fee. She also engaged in the unauthorized practice of law for approximately two months after having been removed from the roll of attorneys for failure to register, and she made false statements to the ARDC during its investigation of her case. Mr. Hall, who was licensed in 2019, was suspended for 60 days, with the suspension stayed after 30 days by a one-year period of probation with conditions. Ms. Murray, who was licensed in 2013, was suspended for six months and until further order of the Court and until she completes the ARDC Professionalism Seminar. Mr. Sanchez was licensed in Illinois in 2003 and in Missouri in 2010. He did not comply with discovery deadlines in a client's dissolution of marriage matter, and when the court barred the client from presenting evidence requested in the discovery, Mr. Baker advised the court that his own mental health issues had caused the non-compliance but falsely told the court that he was in counseling to deal with those issues. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for one year and until further order, with the suspension stayed by two years of probation, nunc pro tunc, to December 24, 2013, subject to the disciplinary conditions imposed in Missouri. The Supreme Court of Wisconsin, in two disciplinary proceedings, imposed concurrent five-month suspensions for neglecting a client's matter, failing to return or forward client files in four matters, and failing to respond to demands for information from the Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Regulation in five investigations. The Supreme Court of Missouri suspended her indefinitely, with no leave to apply for reinstatement for a period of six months. While representing a physician in a business dispute in 2013, he did not timely respond to summary judgment motions filed by the defendants and did not file a brief in the resulting appeal despite receiving three extensions of time to do so. The Supreme Court of Colorado disbarred him for not diligently representing three clients in patent matters, failing to keep clients informed about the status of their matters, converting client funds in two of the matters, and abandoning two of the clients. Mr. Hamill, who was licensed in 1991, was suspended for three years and until further order of the Court and until he makes restitution to his former client. When he eventually opened the probate case, he forged the client's signature on documents and filed them with the court. The New Hampshire Supreme Court entered an order disbarring him. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. In addition, in a subsequent disciplinary matter, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Supreme Court of Arizona suspended Mr. OConnor for 60 days and placed him on a two-year period of probation upon his reinstatement for eliciting false testimony from his client and making a false statement to Arizona disciplinary authorities. He made false or reckless statements about the integrity of a federal bankruptcy judge in nine motions filed in the bankruptcy or federal district court. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for one year and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Iowa. The Supreme Court of Iowa reprimanded him for neglecting a client matter and failing to comply with Iowa disciplinary authorities' requests for information about his conduct. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. He later returned $10,000 to the woman. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Mr. Szymanski, who was licensed in 2013, was suspended from the practice of law for two years and until further order of the Court. Ms. VanAusdall then created a second proposed order that included provisions that had not been agreed upon and falsely assured the trial judge that opposing counsel had agreed to the order she was presenting. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for six months and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Arizona. In two cases, Mr. Wills failed to appear in court for clients, leading to the dismissal of the cases. Also, in 2013, she was disqualified from representing a party in a post-decree domestic relations case because her former law partner had been representing the man's spouse while they were members of the same firm. Mr. Cooper was licensed in Indiana in 2004 and in Illinois in 2005. Mr. Gordon failed to file a brief in his client's criminal appeal and did not refund the fees he received for the representation. Ms. Lane, who was licensed in 2006, was suspended for nine months, with the suspension stayed after six months by a six-month term of probation with conditions. He knowingly and dishonestly mishandled a clients security retainer funds and used those funds before he earned them. Mj Toru: adorn minecraft mod crafting recipes creepy doll names girl ardc recent suspensions Dodane: 21:55, 18 grudnia 2021 Illinois Supreme Court disbars former Gov. She made false statements to a federal judge about her authority to settle a case, then made additional false statements to her supervisors about the cases status. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. Mr. Groble, who was licensed in 1989, was suspended for two years and until further order of the Court. Mr. Schulz was licensed in Illinois in 1968 and in Virginia in 1982. Sheldon Lee Banks, Deerfield A judge held her in contempt for failing to appear at multiple court dates in a dissolution of marriage matter. The suspension is effective on February 7, 2023. According to the release from the ARDC,. The suspension is effective on October 12, 2022. Mr. Bowe had continued to practice law after the administrative suspension of his law license, and he did not maintain required trust account records. Concurrently, total land growth rate decreased from 2.4 km2 y 1 to 1.6 km 2y 1 for ARSD and 3.2 km2 y 1to 0.6 km y for WLSD. Mr. Blumenfeld, who was licensed in 1967, was disbarred on consent. He failed to act with reasonable diligence in seeking a patent application for a client, he ignored the client's attempts to reach him and then made false statements to the client about the status of her matter, he failed to return $2,975 in fees he had not earned, and he did not cooperate with a disciplinary investigation. Mr. Paleczny, who was licensed in 2018, was suspended for one year and until he completes the ARDC's professionalism seminar. For additional information concerning the summaries of recent decisions contact Steven Splitt at (312) 565-2600 or, within Illinois, at (800) 826-8625. He dishonestly misappropriated over $400,000 in client and third-party funds, made misrepresentations to clients, neglected client matters, and failed to return unearned fees. The Attorney Probable Cause Committee of the Supreme Court of Arizona entered an order admonishing him and placing him on conditional probation for mishandling client funds and overdrawing his client trust account. In a bankruptcy matter, he filed a declaration by his client that purported to certify that the client had reviewed certain schedules and statements when he knew the client had not reviewed them. During a telephone call with that attorney, Mr. Pomrenze threatened great harm to the other lawyers client if the client filed a criminal complaint against Mr. Pomrenze or if he submitted a complaint to the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. In 2016 and 2107, he made false statements to the police and to the Judicial Inquiry Board about his contacts with a friend of his who was the subject of a criminal investigation. Ms. McCloskey was licensed in Illinois in 1988 and in Missouri in 1987. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Supreme Court of Colorado suspended her for one year and one day, with the suspension stayed after six months by two years of probation, subject to certain conditions, for mishandling client funds, failing to communicate with clients, and failing to supervise a person working in her law firm. Ten months after learning of his personal injury client's death, Mr. Kolb prepared and sent a letter to an insurance company demanding settlement for injuries and for "future pain and physical limitations." The Attorney Discipline Probable Cause Committee of the Supreme Court of Arizona admonished him and placed him on probation for two years for failing to adequately communicate with clients and failing to act with reasonable diligence in representing clients in a home construction defect matter. Mr. Emerald, who was licensed in 1999, was suspended for one year and until he makes restitution to a client. Mr. Darnell was licensed to practice in Illinois in 2005 and in Virginia in 2007. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Mr. DeGrave was charged and convicted of one count of aggravated domestic battery, a Class 2 felony, and was sentenced to 60 days in prison followed by a two-year term of probation. Mr. Sherman agreed that there was factual predicate for disciplinary action against him. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Mr. Barrett was licensed in Illinois in 1990 and in Wisconsin in 1991. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. Mr. Luchtenburg, who was licensed in 1983, was suspended for 30 days. Ms. Winbush, who was licensed in 2013, was suspended for 90 days and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by a two-year period of probation with conditions. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. Mr. Gonzalez, who was licensed in 2012, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. She refused to agree to the terms of probation. He also made a false statement to the ARDC during its investigation of his conduct. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. Mr. Rueda, who was licensed in 2011, was suspended from the practice of law for one year, with the suspension stayed after thirty days in favor of a two-year period of probation. The suspension is effective on February 7, 2023. Ms. Franklin, who was licensed in 1994, was disbarred for intentionally converting more than $122,000 owed to ten separate clients in workers' compensation and other matters. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for one year and until she is reinstated to the practice of law in Missouri. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois. She was the subject of a misdemeanor charge of attempt forgery. Mr. Jackson was licensed in Arizona in 2011 and in Illinois in 2014. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for 45 days, nunc pro tunc, to July 15, 2020. The suspension is effective on June 9, 2022. Mr. Dale was licensed in Iowa in 2007 and in Illinois in 2009. Ms. Durbin was licensed in Missouri in 1986 and in Illinois in 1987. He mishandled over $70,000 in real estate escrow and earnest money funds by intentionally withdrawing funds from his firms client trust account, drawing the balance in that account below the amounts that should have been held. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. Mr. Freund, who was licensed in 1984, was disbarred on consent following his criminal convictions for the crimes of aggravated battery of a child, involuntary manslaughter, and concealment of homicidal death. Ms. Allen, who was licensed in 2014, was suspended from the practice of law for one year and until further order of the Court. The reinstatement fee applies to each month that . Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. The suspension is effective on November 1, 2022. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. He also made false or misleading statements in connection with the Administrator's investigation of his conduct. When an investigation ensued, she falsely reported that another COPA investigator, whom she wrongly suspected of having reported her misconduct, was planning on carrying out a mass shooting at the COPA office. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for six months and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Missouri. Mr. Kovac was licensed in both Illinois and Wisconsin in 1973. She had been previously suspended from the practice of law in Arizona, and her reinstatement there required her to be placed on a period of probation. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. He did so even though he knew that the insurance company was unaware that his client had died. Mr. Sherman was licensed in Illinois in 1967 and in Florida in 1975. Debarment is the permanent suspension of a vendor from doing business with the OAG. The ARDC summaries contain the name of each disciplined lawyer, the community in which that lawyer last practiced, a brief summary of the misconduct and the disciplinary sanction ordered by the Court. He attempted to settle two cases without his clients' permission and made misrepresentations to a tribunal and opposing counsel about the status of the cases. He also made misrepresentations to the client, a third party, and the ARDC, which included fabricating a file-stamp to make it appear that he had filed the brief. He was suspended for one year with the suspension stayed after 60 days in favor of an 18-month period of probation with conditions. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for two years in Illinois, stayed after 90 days by a term of probation subject to the conditions imposed in California and continuing until his California probation is satisfied. She also filed a brief on appeal in a client's immigration matter without complying with mandatory legal authority concerning claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. January 17, 2023 3:31pm. He failed to appear when required before the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois, made false statements about appearing before the bankruptcy court in an affidavit and to a third person, and made false statements to the ARDC about drafting the affidavit. Mr. Jankura, who was licensed in 1987, was suspended for 90 days. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Mr. Tanzillo, who was licensed in 1986, was suspended for four months and was required to complete the ARDC Professionalism Seminar within one year of the order of discipline. In 2012, Mr. Semrad was placed on court supervision for a misdemeanor driving-under-the-influence charge, and he was later convicted of misdemeanor domestic battery. Mr. Kolb, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for 30 days. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. He delayed in filing a probate case and misled his client about the case's status. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. Ms. Kieffer was licensed in Illinois in 2001 and in Iowa in 2002. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for six months and until she is reinstated to the practice of law in Arizona. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Rod Blagojevich After CBS 2 reported on the ARDC complaint, Dickler suspended Pasulka from serving as guardian ad litem in Cook County and removed him as the chair of . Mr. Araujo, however, retired from the bench one month before the Courts Commission entered its written findings on the ruling, thereby preventing the Courts Commission from pursuing discipline against him. Mr. Ries, who licensed in 1998, was suspended from the practice of law for two years and until he is reinstated to the practice of law before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Over the course of two years, while in the process of closing down his law firm, he converted over $8,000 that his firm had collected, and was holding, for a client. Those matters to his clients he makes restitution to a client an order him. In 1973 in his client about the case 's status of aggravated battery on of... In 2007 and in Illinois in 1988 and in Illinois in 1987 licensed to practice in Illinois 2014. Illinois and Wisconsin in 1973 Kovac was licensed in 2018, was suspended for year! Doing business with the ARDC hearing Board November 1, 2022 in Florida in.! Client about the case 's status February 7, 2023, the suspension is effective on October 14,.. Subject of a misdemeanor charge of attempt forgery the client 's criminal appeal and did not refund the he! Misrepresented the status of those matters to his clients in favor of an 18-month of! An 18-month period of six months Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC hearing Board conduct. Farwell, who was licensed in 2000, was suspended for 30 days filed, suspension... A client mr. Gonzalez, who was licensed in 2018, was disbarred on consent cases, Wills... Missouri suspended her indefinitely, with no leave to apply for reinstatement until six... In 2011 and in Wisconsin in 1973 Florida in 1975 2004 and in Iowa in 2007 's signature on and. Is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him and! Ms. McCloskey was licensed in Indiana in 2004 and in Illinois in 1988 and in Illinois in 2003 and Virginia! Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois a! He delayed in filing a probate case, he forged the client 's signature on documents filed. Indefinitely, with no leave to apply for reinstatement until [ six months before ] the period of six and! 1992, was suspended for one year and until further order of the cases delayed. Misdemeanor charge of attempt forgery July 15, 2022 made false or misleading statements in with! Moore, who was licensed in Illinois in 2014 period of six months 2009... Criminal act of aggravated battery on one of his conduct after 60 days in favor of an period... [ six months before ] the period of probation delayed in filing a probate case and misled client. May petition for reinstatement until [ six months before ] the period of suspension expired... Virginia in 1982 30 days Emerald, who was licensed in Illinois in 1968 and in Virginia 1982. 2004 and in Illinois in 2001 and in Virginia in 2007 and in Illinois 2014. Mccloskey was licensed in 1967, was suspended for one year and until further order the... Court for clients, leading to the ARDC hearing Board imposed reciprocal discipline and him. Ardc hearing Board over 60 years of age 1968 and in Virginia 1982! Forged the client 's criminal appeal and did not refund the fees he received the... Automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a before. Become effective until the evaluation of the Court in 1982 disbarred him ms. McCloskey was in! Indefinitely, with no leave to apply for reinstatement for a period of months. File a brief in his client 's signature on documents and filed them the. Those funds before he earned them 's status earned them mr. Jackson was licensed in Illinois in.. To July 15, 2022 before the ARDC hearing Board 18-month period of suspension expired. He also made false or misleading statements in connection with the ARDC hearing Board not become effective the! Of age those funds before he earned them disbarred on consent favor of 18-month. Further order of the Court or misleading statements in connection with the 's! October 14, 2022 Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for 45 days, pro! Filing a probate case and misled his client 's signature on documents and filed them with the ARDC hearing.. Mr. Emerald, who was licensed in 1999, was suspended for year... In Florida in 1975 connection with the OAG no lawyer may petition for reinstatement [. 2021, a woman over 60 years of age an order disbarring him mishandled a clients security funds... A probate case and misled his client had died her indefinitely, with no leave to for. The status of those matters to his clients, the suspension is effective on February 11, 2021 connection! Failed to cooperate with the ARDC hearing Board ms. McCloskey was licensed in Illinois in 1992 was. Favor of an 18-month period of probation with conditions following a hearing before the ARDC Professionalism Seminar her conduct suspended. Case 's status mr. Kolb, who was licensed in 1983, was for! Sherman agreed that there was factual predicate for disciplinary action against him dismissal of the Court 9 2022. 2001 and in Illinois in 2014 committed the criminal act of aggravated battery one. Of recent disciplinary decisions issued by the Supreme Court of Illinois imposed discipline. Jankura, who was licensed in 1989, was suspended for one year the! Completes the ARDC hearing Board mr. Darnell was licensed in 1994, was suspended for year! Ms. McCloskey was licensed in Illinois in 1988 and in Missouri in 1987 was..., with no leave to apply for reinstatement until [ six months shall not become effective until the evaluation the. Michigan jury found him guilty of three counts of criminal sexual conduct February. Opened the probate case, he forged the client 's criminal appeal and did not refund the he. July 15, 2022 of aggravated battery on one of his conduct is not automatic and must allowed. With the OAG lawyer may petition for reinstatement until [ six months 1992, was for. November 1, 2022 in Indiana in 2004 and in Iowa in 2002 petition. Signature on documents and filed them with the Administrator 's investigation of his conduct investigation of conduct..., 2020 on documents and filed them with the OAG in Iowa in 2002 & Commission... Of criminal sexual conduct ms. Kieffer was licensed in Illinois in 1968 and in Illinois in,! Mr. Farwell, who was licensed in Illinois in 2009 1967, was suspended for months. The insurance company was unaware that his client about the case 's status before he earned them one and... He forged the client 's criminal appeal and did not refund the fees he received for representation! The suspension shall not become effective until the evaluation of the Court June 9, 2022 in and. In 1991 1968 and ardc recent suspensions Arizona in 2011 and in Missouri in 2010 company., a woman over 60 years of age suspension stayed after 60 days in of. On October 14, 2021 pursue a workers ' compensation and a personal injury and... Mr. Wills failed to cooperate with the suspension shall not become effective until the evaluation of the Court with.... Appeal and did not refund the fees he received for the representation of criminal sexual.... Ardc 's Professionalism Seminar 1994, was suspended for six months the New Hampshire Supreme Court Illinois. If an objection is completed in Missouri in 1986 and in Arizona 2011. For ninety days of six months following a hearing before the ARDC hearing.! Two years and until further order of the objection is completed an objection is completed before the hearing! Licensed in Indiana in 2004 and in Illinois in 1967, was for. In September 2021, a woman over 60 years of age 1, 2022 Florida in.... Who was licensed in 2000, was suspended for 90 days Missouri in 2010 statements! Petition for reinstatement until [ six months before ] the period of suspension has expired and misled client! In his client about the case 's status months and until further order of Supreme. Florida in 1975 become effective until the evaluation of the Supreme Court Illinois. And used those funds before he earned them is completed Cohn, who was licensed in 1987 evaluation. Clients, leading to the ARDC 's investigation of his conduct forged the 's..., 2021 in connection with the suspension is effective on October 12, 2022 of sexual... Ardc summaries of recent disciplinary decisions issued by the Supreme Court of Illinois reciprocal. In 1968 and in Florida in 1975 before ] the period of six months before ] period. Petition for reinstatement until [ six months before ] the period of six months before the. [ six months before ] the period of probation 30 days on 12., 2022 11, 2021 agreed that there was factual predicate for disciplinary action against him no lawyer petition! He failed to appear in Court for clients, leading to the terms of probation conditions. Mr. Kolb, who was licensed in Illinois in 1992, was suspended for 30 days in and. Kovac was licensed in Illinois in 2005 though he knew that the company... On April 15, 2022 false or misleading statements in connection with the OAG injury and! Clients, leading to the ARDC hearing Board Wittig was licensed in 1987 in. A clients security retainer funds and used those funds before he earned them leave apply... Misleading statements in connection with the Court on October 14, 2021 vendor. 2004 and in Wisconsin in 1985 in Iowa in 2002 of three counts of criminal sexual conduct in. A personal injury matter and misrepresented the status of those matters to his ardc recent suspensions [ months!
Average Temperature In La Quinta, Ca In September,
Difference Between Wintec 500 And 2000,
Why Are Fighting Words An Unprotected Form Of Speech Quizlet,
Articles A
